![]() ![]() ![]() I have personally experienced the effects of global warming How strongly do you agree or disagree with the statement above? Global warming is affecting the weather in the United States Most scientists think global warming is not happening.There is a lot of disagreement among scientists about whether or not global warming is happening.Most scientists think global warming is happening.Most scientists think global warming is happening Which comes closest to your own view? None of the above because global warming isn’t happening.Caused mostly by natural changes in the environment.Global warming is caused mostly by human activities Assuming global warming is happening, do you think it is… ? What do you think: Do you think that global warming is happening? Global warming refers to the idea that the world’s average temperature has been increasing over the past 150 years, may be increasing more in the future, and that the world’s climate may change as a result. Global warming is happening Recently, you may have noticed that global warming has been getting some attention in the news. Individuals who responded “Don’t know” or who did not answer the question were not modeled separately and appear as gray segments within the bar charts. ![]() For example, for the question measuring how worried respondents are about global warming, “very worried” and “somewhat worried” were combined into a single measure of “worried.” Likewise “Not very worried” and “Not at all worried” were combined into a single measure of “not worried.” The responses below are color coded to indicate how they were grouped into the variables shown on the maps. The response categories for many questions were collapsed into a single variable for mapping. Model estimates in the maps were derived from public responses to the following survey questions. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2583.Ĭlimate Change in the American Mind Survey Question Wording (2017) “The spatial distribution of Republican and Democratic climate opinions at state and local scales,” Climatic Change.Īdditional information about the methods can be found in Howe, P., Mildenberger, M., Marlon, J.R., and Leiserowitz, A., “Geographic variation in opinions on climate change at state and local scales in the USA,” Nature Climate Change. The estimates are derived from a statistical model using multilevel regression with post-stratification (MRP) on a large national survey dataset (n>22,000), along with demographic and geographic population data, along with political party registration data derived from state voter files.įor more details, please see the peer-reviewed paper describing these results: Mildenberger, M., Marlon, J.R., Howe, P.D., & Leiserowitz, A. This site provides estimates of Republicans’ and Democrats’ climate change beliefs, risk perceptions, and policy preferences at the state and congressional district levels – a new source of high-resolution data on public opinion that can inform national, state and local decision-making, policy, and education initiatives. (2017) “The spatial distribution of Republican and Democratic climate opinions at state and local scales,” Climatic Change.Īdditional information can be found in Howe, P., Mildenberger, M., Marlon, J.R., and Leiserowitz, A., “Geographic variation in opinions on climate change at state and local scales in the USA,” Nature Climate Change. Mildenberger, M., Marlon, J.R., Howe, P.D., & Leiserowitz, A. Party registration data is available for 32 states, and is imputed in the remaining states (i.e., in Alabama, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, North Dakota, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin).ĭetails about the methods can be found here: The public opinion estimates were generated using a statistical model that combines nationally representative survey data gathered by the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication and the George Mason Center for Climate Change Communication between 20 with voter registration, U.S. The 2018 Partisan Climate Opinion Maps provide data about how Republican and Democratic climate and energy opinions vary across all 50 states and all 435 congressional districts, revealing spatial patterns with policy-relevant implications for the trajectory of US climate change policy reforms. Historically, our understanding of this partisan variability has been limited to analysis of national- or less commonly, state-level opinion poll subsamples. Even as US partisan polarization shapes climate and energy beliefs and attitudes, substantial heterogeneity in climate opinions still exists among both Republicans and Democrats. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |